November 18th, 2005 (08:20 pm)
Current mood swing -: pissed off
Woman sentenced to one night alone in the woods.
NOVEMBER 18--An Ohio woman convicted of leaving dozens of kittens in two parks has been ordered by a judge to herself spend a night alone outdoors so that she can experience what if feels like to be abandoned, albeit only for about a dozen hours. Michelle Murray, 25, last month pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor for dumping the kittens in September. At a hearing yesterday in Painesville Municipal Court, Judge Michael Cicconetti sentenced Murray to 90 days in jail, though she will spend only 14 of those days in custody. Cicconetti ordered her to surrender to park rangers at 6 PM on November 23, when she will be brought to a "remote location" of a local park and left there until "the light of dawn on November, 24, 2005," according to a court judgment, a copy of which you can find below. Murray will not be allowed to carry and food or beverages other than water, nor will she be provided with shelter. However, she will be given a "means of communication for emergency purposes only." During the sentencing hearing, Cicconetti said that he wanted Murray to "listen to the coyotes, hear the raccoons in the dark of night."
Well, isn't that just dandy? I was just talking about cruel and unusual in another story this morning, and here comes Cicconetti to take that argument right away from me. It's certainly unusual, and the point of the sentence was to be equally cruel to what she did.
The end of November, in Ohio, he's sticking a woman out in the woods overnight? The ACLU had better come to her defense.
Many animals live outdoors; My mom has a cat that comes to the post office to be with her during the daytime, but then goes off into the wilderness at night. Point being, that a cat can and does live outdoors with the howling coyotes. Humans usually do not. One could argue whether her actions were cruel or not. I've had people tell me that *I* am cruel for not letting my cat outside. That's not to say that she wasn't irresponsible for allowing her cats to bread, and it's not to say that she wasn't lazy in not finding home for them, or paying to have the shelter do it, but cruel? I don't think so.
So, the price for irresponsibility, and laziness is getting sent out into the woods in the cold of winder, overnight, to be frightened, and hungry?
My brother came over as I was reading this story, and I showed it to him, and expressed how cruel I thought that it was, and he said he liked what the judge was doing there. He said some people never learn and the judge was trying to teach her a lesson. Not only is that sentiment wrong on too many levels to name, but it frightens the crap out of me. Teach her a lesson? What is she supposed to learn? That is cold in Ohio at night in November? That she doesn't have claws for defense, or instinctive hunting capabilities? What?